Thread:Bagwis/@comment-12719-20171028081346/@comment-32644940-20171028121427

(1) The reason why I removed the deleted the data you have encoded in Report 203 is to basically show you how it works -- and to make you realize that the future editor's encoded data will take precendence over the centralized back-up list.

(2) You know, the main reason why I'm against with your proposal is because it encourages unsustainability in templates. Soon, we're going to have problems in unifying all of these, in managing the templates.

I assume that not all editors are that geeky when it comes to coding. And if you say that, "it's pretty much easy to follow the past examples as a future reference in coding," Well, you could say the same thing for the current templates that we have now, don't you think?

A small adjustment can easily solve your query.